Spring Security
Authentication and Access Control
Application security boils down to two more or less independent problems: authentication (who are you?) and authorization (what are you allowed to do?). Sometimes people say “access control” instead of “authorization”, which can get confusing, but it can be helpful to think of it that way because “authorization” is overloaded in other places. Spring Security has an architecture that is designed to separate authentication from authorization and has strategies and extension points for both.
Authentication
The main strategy interface for authentication is AuthenticationManager , which has only one method:
public interface AuthenticationManager {
Authentication authenticate(Authentication authentication) throws AuthenticationException;
}
An AuthenticationManager can do one of 3 things in its authenticate() method:
- Return an
Authentication(normally withauthenticated=trueif it can verify that the input represents a valid principal. - Throw an
AuthenticationExceptionif it believes that the input represents an invalid principal. - Return
nullif it cannot decide.
AuthenticationException is a runtime exception. It is usually handled by application in a generic way, depending on the style or purpose of the application. In other worlds, user code is not normally expected to catch and handle it. For example, a web UI might render a page that says that the authentication failed, and a backend HTTP service might send a 401 response, with or without a [WWW-Authenticate](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/WWW-Authenticate) header depending on the context.
The most commonly used implementation of AuthenticationManager is ProviderManager, which delegates to a chain of AuthenticationProvider instances. An AuthenticationProvider is a bit like an AuthenticationManager , but it has an extra method to allow the caller to query whether it supports a given Authentication type:
public interface AuthenticationProvider {
Authentication authenticate(Authentication authentication) throws AuthenticationException;
boolean supports(Class<?> authentication);
}
The Class<?> argument in the supports() method is really Class<? extends Authentication (it is only ever asked if it supports something that is passed into the authentication() method). A ProviderManager can support multiple different authentication mechanism in the same application by delegating to a chain of AuthenticationProviders. If a ProviderManager does not recognize a particular Authentication instance type, it is skipped.
A ProviderManager has an option parent, which it can consult if all providers return null. If the parent is not available, a null Authentication results in an AuthenticationException.
Sometimes, an application has logical groups of protected resources (for example, all web resources that match a path pattern, such as /api/** ), and each group can have its own dedicated AuthenticationManager. Often, each of those is a ProviderManager , and they share a parent. The parent is then a kind of global resource, acting as a fallback for all providers.
Customizing Authentication Managers
Spring Security provides some configuration helpers to quickly get common authentication manager features set up in your application. The most commonly used helper is the AuthenticationManagerBuilder which is great for setting up in-memory, JDBC, or LDAP user details or for adding a custom UserDetailsService. The following example shows an application that configures the global (parent) AuthenticationManager :
@Configuration
public class ApplicationSecurity extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter {
// web stuff here
@Autowired
public void initialize(AuthenicationManageBuilder builder, DataSource dataSource) {
builder.jdbcAuthentication().dataSource(dataSource).withUser("dave").password("secret").roles("USE");
}
}
This example relates to a web application, but the usage of AuthenticationManagerBuilder is @Autowired into a method in a @Bean - that is what makes it build the global (parent) AuthenticationManager. In contrast, consider the following example:
@Configuration
public class ApplicationSecurity extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter {
@Autowired
DataSource dataSource;
// web stuff here
@Override
public void configure(AuthenticationManagerBuilder builder) {
builder.jdbcAuthentication().dataSource(dataSource).withUser("dave")
.password("secret").roles("USER");
}
}
If we had used an @Override of a method in the configure, the AuthenticationManagerBuilder would be used only to build a “local” AuthenticationManager, which would be a child of the global one. In Spring Boot application, you can @Autowired the global one into another bean, but you cannot do that with the local one unless you explicitly expose it yourself.
Spring Boot provides a default global AuthenticationManager (with only one user) unless you pre-empt it by providing your own bean of type AuthenticationManager. The default is secure enough on its own for you not to have to worry about it much, unless you actively need a custom global AuthenticationManager , you can often do it locally to the resources that you are protecting and not worry about the global default.
Authorization or Access Control
Once authentication is successful, we can move on to authorization, and the core strategy here is AccessDecisionManager . There are three implementations provided by the framework and all three delegate to a chain of AccessDecisionVoter instances, a bit like ProvideManager delegates to AuthenticationProviders .
An AccessDecisionVoter considers an Authentication (representing a principle) and a secure Object , which has been decorated with ConfigAtrributes :
boolean supports(ConfigAttribute attribute);
boolean supports(Class<?> clazz);
int vote(Authentication authentication, S object, Collection<ConfigAttribute> attributes);
For more specifics, you can reference here to take example of how customize a AccessionDecisionManager
The Object is completely generic in the signatures of the AccessionDecisionManager and AccessionDecisionVoter . It represents anything that a user might want to access (a web resource or a method in a java class are the two most common cases). The ConfigAttribures are also fairly generic, representing a decoration of the secure Object with some metadata that determines the level of permission required to access it. ConfigAttribute is an interface. It has only one method (which is quite generic and returns a String), so these strings encode in some way the intention of the owner of the resource, expressing rules about who is allowed to access it. A typical ConfigAttribute is the name of a user role (like ROLE_ADMIN or ROLE_AUDIT), and they often have special formats (like the ****ROLE_**** prefix) or represent expressions that need to be evaluated.
Most people use the default AccessDecisionManager, which is AffirmativeBase (if any voters return affirmatively, access is granted). Any customization tends to happen in the voters, either by adding new ones or modifying the way that the existing ones work.
It is very common to use ConfigAttributes that are Spring Expression Language (SpEL) expressions - for example, isFullyAuthenticated() && hasRole('user') . This is supported by AccessDecisionVoter that ca handle the expressions and create a context for them. To extend the range of expressions that can be handled requires a custom implementation of SecurityExpressionRoot and sometimes also SecurityExpressionHandler .
Web Security
Spring Security in the web tier (for UIs and HTTP back ends) is based on Servlet Filter, so it is helpful to first look at the role of Filters generally. The following picture shows the typical layering of the handlers for a single HTTP request.
The client sends a request to the application, and the container decides which filters and which servlet apply to it based on the path of the request URI. At most, one servlet can handle a single request, but filters form a chain, so they are ordered. In fact, a filter can veto the rest of the chain if it wants to handle the request itself. A filter can also modify the request or the response used in the downstream filters and servlet. The order of the filter chain is very important, and Spring Boot manages it through two mechanism:
@Beans of type Filter can have an @Order or implement Ordered , and they can be part of a FilterRegistrationBean that itself has an order as part of its API. Some off-the-shell filters define their own constants to help signal what order they like to be in relative to each
For example, the SessionnRepositoryFilter from Spring Session has a DEFAULT_ORDER of INTEGER.MIN_VALUE + 50 , which tells us it likes to be early in the chain, but it does not rule out other filters coming before it)
Spring Security is installed as a single Filter in the chain, and its concrete type is FilterChainProxy , for reasons that we cover soon.
In a Spring Boot application, the security filter is a @Bean in the ApplicationContext , and it is installed by default so that it is applied to every request. It is installed at a position define by SecurityProperties.DEFAULT_FILTER_ORDER, which in turn is anchored by FilterRegistrationBean.REQUEST_WRAPPER_FILTER_MAX_ORDER (the maximum order that a Spring Boot application expects filters to have if they wrap the request, modifying its behavior). There is more to it than that, though: From the point of view of the container, Spring Security is a single filter, but, inside of it, there are addition filters, each playing a special role. The following image shows this relationship:
Figure 2. Spring Security is a single physical Filter but delegates processing to a chain of internal filters
In fact, there is even one more layer of indirection in the security filter: It is usually installed in the container as a DelegatingFilterProxy, which does not have to be a Spring @Bean , The proxy delegates to a FilterChainProxy , which is always a @Bean, usually with a fixed name of springSecurityFilterChain. It is the FilterChainProxy that contains all the security logic arranged internally as a chain (or chains) of filters. All the filters have the same API (they all implement the Filter interface from the Servlet specification), and they all have the opportunity to veto the rest of the chain.
There can be multiple filter chains all managed by Spring Security in the same top level FilterChainProxy and all are unknown to the container. The Spring Security filter contains a list of filter chains and dispatches a request to the first chain that matches it. The following picture shows the dispatch happening based on matching the request path /foo/** matches before /**. This is very common but not the only way to match a request. The most important feature of this dispatch process is that only one chain ever handles a request.
Figure 3. The Spring Security FilterChainProxy dispatches requests to the first chain that matches.
A vanilla Spring Boot application with no custom security configuration has a several (call it n) filter chains, where usually n = 6. The first (n-1) chains are there just to ignore static resource patterns, like /css/** and /images/** , and the error view: /error . (The paths can be controlled by the user with security.ignored from the SecurityProperties configuration bean.) The last chain matches the catch-all path /** ) and it is more active, containing logic for authentication, authorization, exception handling, session handling, header writing, and so on. There are a total of 11 filters in this chain by default, but normally it is not necessary for users to concern themselves with which filters are used and when.
The fact that all filters internal to Spring Security are unknown to the container is important, especially in a Spring Boot application, where, by default, all
@Beansof typeFilterare registered automatically with the container. So if you want to add a custom filter to the security, you need to either not make it be a@Beanor wrap it in aFilterRegistrationBeanthat explicitly disables the container registration.
Creating and Customizing Filter Chains
The default fallback filter chain in a Spring Boot application (the one with the /** request matcher) has a predefined order of SecurityProperties.BASIC_AUTH_ORDER . You can switch it off completely by setting security.basic.enabled=false, or you can use it as a fallback and define other rules with a lower order. To do the latter, add a @Bean of type WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter (or WebSecurityConfiguer) and decorate the class with @Order, as follows:
@Configuration
@Order(SecurityProperties.BASIC_AUTH_ORDER - 10)
public class ApplicationConfigurerAdapter extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter {
@Override
protected void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
http.antMatcher("/match1/**")
...;
}
}
This bean causes Spring Security to add a new filter chain and order it before the fallback.
Many applications have completely different access rules for one set of resources compared to another. For example, an application that hosts a UI and a backing API might support cookie-based authentication with a redirect to a login page for the UI parts and token-based authentication with a 401 response to unauthenticated requests for the API parts. Each set of resources has its own WebSecurityConfiguerAdapter with a unique order and its own request matcher. If the matching rules overlap, the earliest ordered filter chains win.
Request Matching for Dispatch and Authorization
A security filter chain (or, equivalently, a WebSecurityConfiguerAdapter) has a request matcher that is used to decide whether to apply it to an HTTP request. Once the decision is made to apply a particular filter chain, no others are applied. However, within a filter chain, you can have more fine-grained control of authorization by setting additional matchers in the HttpSecurity configurer, as follows:
@Configuration
@Order(SecurityProperties.BASIC_AUTH_ORDER - 10)
public class ApplicationConfigurerAdapter extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter {
@Override
protected void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
http.antMatcher("/match1/**")
.authorizeRequests()
.antMatchers("/match1/user").hasRole("USER")
.antMatchers("/match1/spam").hasRole("SPAM")
.anyRequest().isAuthenticated();
}
}
One of the easiest mistakes to make when configuring Spring Security is to forget that these matchers apply to different processes. One is a request matcher for the whole filter chain, and the other is only to choose the access rule to apply.
Combining Application Security Rules with Actuator Rules
If you use the Spring Boot Actuator for management endpoints, you probably want them to be secure, and, by default, they are. In fact, as soon as you add the Actuator to a secure application, you get an additional filter chain that applies only to the actuator endpoints. It is defined with a request matcher that matches only actuator endpoints and it has an order of ManagementServerProperties.BASIC_AUTH_ORDER, which is 5 fewer than the default SecurityProperties fallback filter, so it is consulted before the fallback.
If you want your application security rules to apply to the actuator endpoints, you can add a filter chain that is order earlier than the actuator one and that has a request matcher that includes all actuator endpoints. If you prefer the default security settings for the actuator endpoints, the easiest thing is to add your own filter later than the actuator one, but earlier than the fallback (for example, ManagementServerProperties.BASIC_AUTH_ORDER + 1), as follows:
@Configuration
@Order(ManagementServerProperties.BASIC_AUTH_ORDER + 1)
public class ApplicationConfigurerAdapter extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter {
@Override
protected void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception {
http.antMatcher("/foo/**")
...;
}
}
Spring Security in the web tier is currently tied to the Servlet API, so it is only really applicable when running an application in a servlet container, either embedded or otherwise. It is not, however, tied to Spring MVC or the rest of the Spring Web stack, so it can be used in any servlet application - for instance, one using JAX-RS.
Method Security
As well as support for securing web applications, Spring Security offers support for applying access rules to java method executions. For Spring Security, this is just a different type of “protected resource”.
For users, it means the access rules are declared using the same format of ConfigAttribute strings (for example, roles or expressions) but in different place in your code. The first step is to enable method security -for example, in the top level configuration for our application.
@SpringBootApplication
@EnableGlobalMethodSecurity(securedEnabled = true)
public class SampleSecureApplication {
}
Then we can decorate the method resources directly:
@Service
public class MyService {
@Secured("ROLE_USER")
public String secure() {
return "Hello Security";
}
}
This example is a service with a secure method. If Spring creates a @Bean of this type, it is proxied and callers have to go through a security interceptor before the method is actually executed. If access is denied, the caller gets an AccessDeniedException instead of the actual method result.
There are other annotations that you can use on methods to enforce security constraints, notably @PreAuthorize and @PostAuthorize which let you write expressions containing references to method parameter and return values, respectively.
It is not uncommon to combine Web security and Method security. The filter chain provides the user experience Tip features, such as authentication and redirect to login pages and so on, and the method security provides protection at a more granular level.
Working with Threads
Spring Security is fundamentally thread-bound, because it needs to make the current authenticated principle available to a wide variety of downstream consumers. The basic building blocks is the SecurityContext, which may contain an Authentication (and when a user is logged in it is an Authentication that is explicitly authenticated).
You can always access and manipulate the SecurityContext through static convenience methods in SecurityContextHolder, which, in turn, manipulate a ThreadLocal. The following example shows such an arrangement:
SecurityContext context = SecurityContextHolder.getContext();
Authentication authentication = context.getAuthentication();
assert(authentication.isAuthenticated);
It is **not** common for user application code to do this, but it can be useful if you, for instance, need to write a custom authentication filter (although, even then, there are base classes in Spring Security that you can use so that you could avoid needing to use SecurityContextHolder.
If you need access to the currently authenticated user in a web endpoint, you can use a method parameter in a @RequestMapping , as follows:
@RequestMapping("/foo")
public String foo(@AuthenticationPrincipal User user) {
... // do stuff with user
}
This annotation pulls the current Authentication out of the SecurityContext and calls the getPrincipal() method on it to yield the method parameter. The type of the Principle in an Authentication is dependent on the AuthenticationManager used to validate the authentication, so this can be useful little trick to get a type-safe reference to your user data.
If Spring Security is in use, the Principle from the HttpServletRequest is of type Authentication, so you can also use that directly:
@RequestMapping("/foo")
public String foo(Principal principal) {
Authentication authentication = (Authentication) principal;
User = (User) authentication.getPrincipal();
... // do stuff with user
}
This can sometimes be useful if you need to write code that works when Spring Security is not in use (you would need to be more defensive about loading the Authentication class).
Processing Secure Method Asynchronously
Since the SecurityContext is thread-bound, if you want to do any background processing that calls secure methods (for example, with @Async ), you need to ensure that the context is propagated. This boils down to wrapping the SecurityContext with the task Runnable, Callable, and so on) that is executed in the background.
Spring Security provides some helpers to make this easier, such as wrappers for Runnable and Callable. To propagate the SecurityContext to @Async methods, you need to supply an @AsyncConfigurer and secure the Executor is of the correct type:
@Configuration
public class ApplicationConfiguration extends AsyncConfigurerSupport {
@Override
public Executor getAsyncExecutor() {
return new DelegatingSecurityContextExecutorService(Executors.newFixedThreadPool(5));
}
}
